An assessment of full cross-validation
by Mark C. Greenwood and Glenna Gordon.
Full cross-validation was promoted as an alternative to regular cross-validation for nonlinear regression model selection in Bunke et al. (1998, 1999). In Droge (1995), simulations were performed to explore its performance for model selection in a polynomial regression context, finding mixed results at best. The poor performance of the method was not highlighted in later publications related to the method. In this work, we explore its performance for nonlinear regression models, which has not been evaluated previously. The method is attractive for use in situations where cross-validation methods are desired but estimation algorithms are not easily modified for missing observations or estimation can easily diverge when design points are removed, such as nonlinear regression. A simulation study is used to reinforce the poor performance of FCV for model selection in linear regression and to demonstrate that its problems extend into nonlinear regression models as well. For moderate sample sizes in linear regression, the problems with FCV seem to diminish but the protection of a larger sample size seems to disappear for the nonlinear regression models explored. This suggests caution in using FCV for model selection in general.
Model Selection, Cross Validation, Full Cross Validation, Linear Regression, Nonlinear Regression
Mark C. Greenwood, email@example.com
Glenna Gordon, firstname.lastname@example.org
R.G. Graf, email@example.com
READING THE ARTICLE: You can read the article in
portable document (.pdf) format (165997 bytes.)
NOTE: The content of this article is the intellectual property of the authors, who retains all rights to future publication.
This page has been accessed 1922 times since AUGUST 14, 2010.
Return to the Home Page.